November 11, 2024, 03:20 PM
*weeps*
I had such pretty things cued up to spiff up her profile. But I suspected this’d be the decision.
Adobe Firefly is still ethically created AI art, and is approved for use here if there is a watermark. That is no longer an option. The problem with AF is proving that it was created using that program. If a screenshot taken of the program with the artwork was provided as proof that it was indeed created using AF, would that suffice as proof? This is something that could probably be photoshopped if someone wanted to go that far and had the ability to do so- but so could the Adobe Firefly watermark.
Thoughts?
I had such pretty things cued up to spiff up her profile. But I suspected this’d be the decision.
Adobe Firefly is still ethically created AI art, and is approved for use here if there is a watermark. That is no longer an option. The problem with AF is proving that it was created using that program. If a screenshot taken of the program with the artwork was provided as proof that it was indeed created using AF, would that suffice as proof? This is something that could probably be photoshopped if someone wanted to go that far and had the ability to do so- but so could the Adobe Firefly watermark.
Thoughts?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
AI Art: adobe firefly watermark question - by Creggan White Hare - September 30, 2024, 12:29 PM
RE: AI Art: adobe firefly watermark question - by Val - October 04, 2024, 10:56 AM
RE: AI Art: adobe firefly watermark question - by Creggan White Hare - October 16, 2024, 07:23 PM
RE: AI Art: adobe firefly watermark question - by Gideon - November 11, 2024, 02:58 PM
RE: AI Art: adobe firefly watermark question - by Creggan White Hare - November 11, 2024, 03:20 PM