pack colors, the 3.1 rule question

Accessibility/site readability has always been a requirement for pack colors, and if pack colors were too bright or unsuitable this was communicated during the pack-app process, or, once the pack was ready to be set up. I had Malkaria's (2016) original colors rejected and had to adjust for saturation. I believe Triva Mountain's also had to be fixed, though that pack never officially formed.

The CMs have been using a website for the last two+ years to make things objective as possible, the metric was +2.0 and this has been consistently enforced since my first ACM term which was in 2018. (MSP was formed before this rule was in place.)

The rule was posted for transparency recently, since a lot of pack applications lately have applied with colors that are unreadable. With dark mode now, we're finding that the previous 2.0+ is just not feasible. There are some pack colors that do meet our old requirements that are plain unreadable in dark mode, and sometimes in light mode too.  

I hope that clears some confusion up. <3