Member Questions

i like everything as it is, i literally played an ant & it was fun. personally when it comes to interaction with WF, I rank it in order of realism. makes sense for wolves & birds to get along & cooperate, as they do IRL. makes less sense for wolves to get along with pumas, though they do, or bears to heed the word of a wolf -- sharing the same hunting areas does not an ally make. so I would take that into account as well if I was doing a plot that involved WF. 

the fun part for me has always been the semi realism. wolves and WF talking. interacting. allying, like wolves & WF have done here. familiars. wards. spies (as in ravens hinting toward danger). protectors. i like it tons.

it seems like there's a real schism between players and players/cms. everyone who is a CM also participates or has participated in the game and discussion as a player. it's never been just players and staff afaik. it's always been that administration comes from inside the playerbase.

if we get rid of the rule it should be a universal thing. there shouldn't be a reason for the admins to revisit the WF topic if we're going to lift all restrictions on it. i can see it putting them into this place where they have to pick and choose between different WF plots and that wouldn't be cool for anyone involved. 

my gameplay is not going to be affected if things change or don't change. still gonna participate & like it. that colors my responses in community discussions, and makes them rare. but it seems like these talks do get strained & it sucks a bit bc i feel that all of u are very wonderful