Do non-account NPCs count toward puppy slots?
Loner
5,198 Posts
Ooc — Kat
Master Guardian
Master Tactician
Master Warrior
Offline
#8
(August 30, 2019, 09:10 AM)Maegi Wrote:
(August 30, 2019, 08:23 AM)Indra Wrote: Maybe we need to firm up the language, as personally, I’d be in favor of all puppies period requiring accounts and the appropriate user titling (such as, ranked in a pack) even if they were dying — for clarity and also for tracking purposes. In *that* scenario they would most definitely count towards the total puppy count.

This is basically the crux of what I'm getting at -- I would also be in favor of this rule. It would eliminate the need to even have this conversation.

First of all, this is an excellent question. Thank you for asking.

I am leaning toward this myself and we are definitely discussing this currently.

We like to have simple, clear-cut rules without all sorts of exceptions and this approach would satisfy that, I think.

My only concern is that we'd see a lot less puppy deaths, which are great plot devices, but I'm probably the only one who'd be genuinely sad about that, lol, so...

-Signing.- | "Speaking." | -"Signing & speaking."- | "Mouthing (inaudible)." | Thoughts.
Messages In This Thread
Do non-account NPCs count toward puppy slots? - by Maegi - August 29, 2019, 05:09 PM
RE: Do non-account NPCs count toward puppy slots? - by Towhee - August 30, 2019, 09:42 AM